Share
Proof, Compliance & Security

The Audit Question Is Not Just What Happened. It Is What Authority Existed When It Happened.

Best for: CISO Compliance Officer Chief AI Officer Internal Audit
Proof

authority context preserved on governed business events

The Challenge

  • Agent logs often show the final action but not the authority model, visible tools, persona, resources, and decision context that shaped it
  • When a model changes behavior, auditors need to know whether authority changed, context changed, or the model simply made a different choice
  • Screenshots and generic logs do not prove that the agent stayed inside delegated authority

The Solution

  • IdentityRM records authority context fingerprints with governed events, binding action evidence to persona, scope, tools, and decision factors
  • Event logging turns autonomous work into reviewable business history instead of detached technical telemetry
  • Auditors can reconstruct what the operator or agent could see and do at the time of action

The Difference

Generic Agent Logs

Action recorded without authority context

IdentityRM Authority Proof

Action tied to persona, scope, and visible tools

Generic Agent Logs

Tool call explains only the API

IdentityRM Authority Proof

Event explains the governed business action

Generic Agent Logs

Model behavior is hard to defend

IdentityRM Authority Proof

Runtime context is fingerprinted

Generic Agent Logs

Audit asks for screenshots

IdentityRM Authority Proof

Audit receives durable proof

Generic Agent Logs

After-the-fact investigation

IdentityRM Authority Proof

Designed-in evidence trail

Who

Human, agent, persona, and delegation

What

Visible tools, resources, and requested action

Why

Decision factors and authority fingerprint

Ready to solve this?

See how authority proof for agent actions works in practice.